Strengths and Weaknesses of GCP vs AWS

1. Weaknesses of GCP Compared to AWS

  • Smaller Market Share: AWS holds the largest market share (~30-35%), whereas GCP is significantly behind (~10%). This results in fewer learning resources, fewer experienced professionals, and a smaller ecosystem of partners compared to AWS.
  • Fewer Services: AWS offers a broader range of services, especially in IoT, AI/ML, analytics, blockchain, game development, and more.
  • Weaker Enterprise Support: AWS has a more robust enterprise-grade ecosystem, providing better support for large businesses, while GCP mainly focuses on startups and data-driven companies.
  • Fewer Data Centers: AWS has more regions and availability zones, providing better latency optimization and high availability (HA).
  • Weaker DevOps, CI/CD Ecosystem: AWS has powerful CI/CD tools like CodePipeline, CodeDeploy, and CodeBuild, whereas GCP has Cloud Build, which lacks the same level of maturity.
  • Limited Hybrid Cloud Support: AWS offers Outposts, VMware on AWS, and Local Zones, which provide better hybrid cloud support than Google Anthos.
  • Pricing Model Is Less Transparent: While AWS has complex pricing structures, they are more transparent than GCP’s automatic discounts, which can make long-term cost prediction harder.

2. Strengths of GCP Compared to AWS

  • Superior AI/ML and Big Data Capabilities:
    • BigQuery is significantly faster than Amazon Redshift.
    • Google AutoML is easier to use and often more powerful than AWS SageMaker.
    • Google’s TensorFlow and Vertex AI give GCP an advantage in AI/ML.
  • Better Pricing in Some Areas:
    • Compute Engine has Sustained Use Discounts, which automatically reduce costs over time.
    • Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) is often cheaper than AWS EKS.
    • Google Cloud Storage can be more cost-effective than Amazon S3 for certain storage tiers.
  • Better Multi-Cloud Support:
    • Anthos allows workloads to run on AWS and Azure, making it a better multi-cloud solution.
    • BigQuery Omni enables cross-cloud queries on AWS and Azure without data migration.
  • Stronger Network Infrastructure:
    • Google owns a global fiber-optic network, reducing latency and improving data transfer speeds.
    • Google’s Load Balancer is global, whereas AWS’s load balancers are region-based.
  • More User-Friendly Interface:
    • Google Cloud Console is more intuitive and user-friendly than AWS’s complex console.
  • Automatic Discounts (Sustained Use & Committed Use Discounts):
    • No need for Reserved Instances like AWS—GCP automatically applies discounts for long-term usage.
  • Simpler Billing Policy:
    • GCP automatically provides discounts, whereas AWS requires manual Savings Plans or Reserved Instances to reduce costs.

3. AWS vs. GCP: Which One Should You Choose?

CriteriaAWSGCP
AI/ML ServicesAverageStronger (AutoML, Vertex AI, BigQuery ML)
Big Data & AnalyticsRedshift, AthenaBigQuery is superior
Market Share & EcosystemLargest, with many servicesSmaller but AI/ML-focused
Data Centers & Availability ZonesMoreFewer than AWS
CI/CD & DevOpsStrong (CodePipeline, CodeBuild)Weaker than AWS
Hybrid Cloud SupportOutposts, Local ZonesAnthos (Multi-cloud support)
Load BalancerRegionalGlobal
Cost EfficiencyHigher if not optimizedBetter for some services (Compute Engine, BigQuery)
Ease of UseMore complexMore intuitive interface

Choose AWS if: You need a large ecosystem, extensive service options, strong hybrid cloud support, and enterprise-level reliability.
Choose GCP if: You focus on AI/ML, big data analytics, Kubernetes, multi-cloud, or want lower compute costs.

Leave a comment

I’m Tran Minh

Hi, I’m Trần Minh, a Solution Architect passionate about crafting innovative and efficient solutions that make technology work seamlessly for you. Whether you’re here to explore the latest in tech or just to get inspired, I hope you find something that sparks joy and curiosity. Let’s embark on this exciting journey together!

Let’s connect